How does this look in your browser? (Pinboard)

[morgandawn]

 OPTION 1

Humble Opinions on Good Vidding (post from 2007) 
https://vidding.livejournal.com/1032639.html?format=light

In my opinion, to understand how you make a good video, you have to take a step back and not look so much at what people have done but why.

vidlink  
2019.05.28   17:39:45 by morgandawn 

  edit   

delete

 

 

✭

Vidders - Understanding Both Halves of Your Audience (post from 2008) 
https://morgandawn.dreamwidth.org/792472.html

I have this idea for a panel...Vidders: Understanding Both Halves of Your Audience. And it would be a vastly over-simplified panel dividing the vidding audience into two "vastly oversimplified and somewhat random but let's just play along" groups: Kinetic Viewers and Narrative Viewers.

vidlink  
2019.05.28   17:38:48 by morgandawn 

  edit   

delete

 

 

✭

I’m frustrated with a vid project so I’m gonna... - SPECIAL WHEN LIT 
https://redscullyrevival.tumblr.com/post/184509182140/im-frustrated-with-a-vid-project-so-…

I’m frustrated with a vid project so I’m gonna blab to myself even though I’ve got my outline and concept written - maybe I’ll find some vein I’ve yet to tap this time around, I dunno. 

So I’m making a ToS Star Trek vid with the concept being three layers of how the women of Star Trek are often times “bad”:

vidlink  
2019.05.28   17:37:47 by morgandawn 

  edit   

delete

*******************************************
 OPTION 2

Humble Opinions on Good Vidding (post from 2007) 
https://vidding.livejournal.com/1032639.html?format=light

In my opinion, to understand how you make a good video, you have to take a step back and not look so much at what people have done but why.

vidlink  
2019.05.28   17:39:45 by morgandawn 

  edit   

delete

 

 

✭

Vidders - Understanding Both Halves of Your Audience (post from 2008) 
https://morgandawn.dreamwidth.org/792472.html

I have this idea for a panel...Vidders: Understanding Both Halves of Your Audience. And it would be a vastly over-simplified panel dividing the vidding audience into two "vastly oversimplified and somewhat random but let's just play along" groups: Kinetic Viewers and Narrative Viewers.

vidlink  
2019.05.28   17:38:48 by morgandawn 

  edit   

delete

 

 

✭

I’m frustrated with a vid project so I’m gonna... - SPECIAL WHEN LIT 
https://redscullyrevival.tumblr.com/post/184509182140/im-frustrated-with-a-vid-project-so-…

I’m frustrated with a vid project so I’m gonna blab to myself even though I’ve got my outline and concept written - maybe I’ll find some vein I’ve yet to tap this time around, I dunno. 

So I’m making a ToS Star Trek vid with the concept being three layers of how the women of Star Trek are often times “bad”:

vidlink  
2019.05.28   17:37:47 by morgandawn 

  edit   

delete
*********************************************************
OPTION 3

Humble Opinions on Good Vidding (post from 2007)  https://vidding.livejournal.com/1032639.html?format=light

In my opinion, to understand how you make a good video, you have to take a step back and not look so much at what people have done but why.

Vidders - Understanding Both Halves of Your Audience (post from 2008) https://morgandawn.dreamwidth.org/792472.html

I have this idea for a panel...Vidders: Understanding Both Halves of Your Audience. And it would be a vastly over-simplified panel dividing the vidding audience into two "vastly oversimplified and somewhat random but let's just play along" groups: Kinetic Viewers and Narrative Viewers.

I’m frustrated with a vid project so I’m gonna... - SPECIAL WHEN LIT https://redscullyrevival.tumblr.com/post/184509182140/im-frustrated-with-a-vid-project-so-…

I’m frustrated with a vid project so I’m gonna blab to myself even though I’ve got my outline and concept written - maybe I’ll find some vein I’ve yet to tap this time around, I dunno. So I’m making a ToS Star Trek vid with the concept being three layers of how the women of Star Trek are often times “bad”:

Comments

[green]

I'd go with option 1 since it includes your tag(s). But if that's not a concern I'd go with 3.

[wendelah1]

Three is easier to read by far. It would be even better if the text for the links wasn't so tiny. Thanks for asking.