charlottechill: (Default)
charlottechill ([personal profile] charlottechill) wrote in [personal profile] morgandawn 2013-06-07 12:37 pm (UTC)

Wow. Just--wow. I can't figure out if this was prescient, avant garde, British, or just plain reasonable. But that's a great letter, and it speaks really well to the nature of properties, of franchises over actors. (Even while reading that old letter, I was flashing on the number of different people who have played Sherlock Holmes, or myriad real historical characters, or Frankenstein or Dracula. At the time, I can get how foreign and awful it felt to replace the actor/icons, but with perspective--and a lot more exposure to successful reboots--I can agree with Harve and understand his justifiable annoyance.

As always, thanks for the work you're doing to capture our history. It reminds me of how truly history repeats.

Incidentally, a recent episode of "The Big Bang Theory" used the Zachary Quinto meme, and how Sheldon had been *so sure* it would be horrible without Nimoy. Then he loved Zachary Quinto at least as much. History also self-references. *g*

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org